What Is Karachi Agreement Related To

With regard to the loss of Gilgit-Baltistan, Snedden Sardar Ibrahim accepts the argument that Azad Kashmir`s physical ties to Gilgit-Baltistan are weak. It was expected that Pakistan would manage it more easily via Peshawar or Rawalpindi. [6] However, in the years that followed, Azad Kaschmir tried to regain control of Gilgit-Baltistan through various means. In 1972, the Azad Kashmir Legislative Assembly passed a resolution on the recovery of Gilgit-Baltistan. The intermediate constitution of Azad Kashmir, formulated in 1974, lists gilgit-Baltistan as part of Azad Kashmir. In 1992, the Azad Kashmir High Court admitted a petition and ordered that the government of Azad Kashmir take control of Gilgit-Baltistan. However, the order was challenged in the Supreme Court of Azad Kashmir, which overturned it, although he claimed that gilgit-Baltistan was part of Jammu and Kashmir. [8] The people of Gilgit-Baltistan would have been outraged by the Karachi agreement because there were no representatives of them who thought that the agreement was the fate of Gilgit-Baltistan. [9] Christopher Snedden says that the government of Azad Kashmir and the Muslim Conference accepted the agreement because they wanted Azad cashmere to join Pakistan, which they were expecting soon with the promised referendum. According to him, this relationship was similar to that of Pakistan with its other provinces. [6] B. The delegations of India and Pakistan, duly authorized, reached the following agreement: the Karachi Agreement is an agreement that would have been reached on 28 April 1949 between the Pakistani government and the government of Azad Kashmir at the time, which governs relations between Pakistan and Azad Kashmir.

It defined the division of powers between the two governments and the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference. By the agreement, azad-cashmere gave the Pakistani government full control of Gilgit-Baltistan (then called “northern zones”) and control over defence, foreign policy and communication issues on its own territory. For decades, the inhabitants of PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan have been highly discriminated against and persecuted because of distorted policies and agreements framed by Islamabad. S.K. Sinha said that Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had informed the Indian delegation prior to the Karachi meeting, telling them that the UN resolution recognized the legality of Kashmir`s accession to India and that, therefore, any “no man`s land” would belong to India. The Pakistani delegation should provide the UN Commission with proof of its actual positions of control over the entire territory they claim. Sinha explained that, on the basis of this principle, the agreement delimited several hundred square kilometres of territory on the Indian side, although there were no Indian troops in the area. [5] According to Christopher Snedden, the agreement was very favourable to Pakistan and deprived Azad Kashmiris of considerable powers and responsibilities. [3] The agreement was apparently kept as a secret document until the 1990s.